Book chapter

Commodification o giustizia ambientale? I PES come strumento di governance del valore della natura

Davide Marino
University of Molise, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-2471-6612


ABOUT THIS CHAPTER

Having defined the fundamental concepts related to the debate on ecosystem services within the framework of Socio-Ecological Systems, and starting from a critique of GDP and traditional accounting systems, new tools and methodologies functional to measuring the well-being and wealth of society are illustrated, which include the accounting of natural capital and associated ecosystem services. The PES (Payments for Ecosystem Services) tool is studied in detail and the possibility of using it for territorial rebalancing and social justice purposes is analysed.
Read more

Keywords: Natural Capital, Payments for Ecosystem Services, Socio-Ecological System (SES), economic assessment of the environment, Capitalocene

Formats

PDF

Pages: 87-96

Published by: Firenze University Press

Publication year: 2020

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-050-4.11

Download PDF

© 2020 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0

XML

Publication year: 2020

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-050-4.11

Download XML

© 2020 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0

References

  1. Avallone G., Leonardi E. (2018), “Anthropocene? More like ‘Capitalocene’”, Il Manifesto Global, 10/6/2018, <https://global.ilmanifesto.it/anthropocene-more-like-capitalocene/> (02/2020).
  2. Barbero A., Leonardi E. (2017), “Introduzione”, in Moore J.W. (2017), Antropocene o Capitalocene? Scenari di ecologia-mondo nell’era della crisi planetaria, Ombre Corte, Verona, pp. 1-7.
  3. Borghi E. (2017), Piccole Italie, Donzelli, Roma.
  4. Costanza R., D’Arge R., De Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O’Neill R., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., Van Den Belt M. (1997), “Value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital”, Nature, vol. 387, n. 6630, pp. 253-260.
  5. Costanza R., Daly H.E. (1992), “Natural capital and sustainable development”, Conservation Biology, vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 37-46.
  6. Costanza R., De Groot R., Braat L., Kubiszewski I., Fioramonti L., Sutton P., Farber P., Grasso M. (2017), “Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to gos?”, Ecosystem Services, n. 28, pp. 1-16.
  7. Daily G. (1997), Nature’s sservices: societal dependence on natural ecosystems, Island Press, Washington.
  8. Daly H.E., Cobb J.B. Jr. (1994), Un’economia per il bene comune. Il nuovo paradigma economico orientato verso la comunità, l’ambiente e un futuro ecologicamente sostenibile, Red Edizioni, Como (ed. or. 1989).
  9. Georgescu-Roegen N. (1978), “De la science économique à la bioéconomie”, Revue d’économie politique, vol. 88, n. 3, pp. 337-382.
  10. Gómez-Baggethun E., Ruiz-Pérez M. (2011), “Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services”, Progress in Physical Geography, vol. 35, n. 5, pp. 613-628.
  11. Haines-Young R.H., Potschin M. (2009), Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services. Final report, JNCC, London.
  12. Mace G.M. (2014), “Whose conservation?”, Science, n. 345, pp. 1558-1560.
  13. Marino D., Palmieri M. (2017), “Investing in nature: working with public expenditure and private payments for a new governance model”, in Paracchini M.L., Zingari P.C., Blasi C. (a cura di), Re-connecting natural and cultural capital. Contributions from science and policy, Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  14. MEA - Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis, Island Press, Washington.
  15. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens W.W. (1972), I limiti dello sviluppo. Rapporto del System Dynamics Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) per il progetto del Club di Roma sui dilemmi dell’umanità, Mondadori, Milano.
  16. Monbiot G. (2018), “The UK government wants to put a price on nature –   but that will destroy it”, The Guardian, 15 Maggio 2018.
  17. Moore J.W. (2017), Antropocene o Capitalocene? Scenari di ecologia-mondo nell’era della crisi planetaria, Ombre Corte, Verona.
  18. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., May P. (2010), “Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for ecosystem services”, Ecological Economics, n. 69, pp. 1202-1208.
  19. Putnam R.D. (1995), “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 65-78.
  20. Rosés J., Wolf N. (2018), “The return of regional inequality: Europe from 1900 to today”, VOX, <https://voxeu.org/article/return-regional-inequality-europe-1900-today> (02/2020).
  21. Wunder S. (2005), Payments for Environmental Services: some nuts and bolts, Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta.

Export citation

Selected format

Usage statistics policy

  • 2Chapter Downloads

Cita come:
Marino, D.; 2020; Commodification o giustizia ambientale? I PES come strumento di governance del valore della natura. Firenze, Firenze University Press.


Distributori


Indici e aggregatori bibliometrici