Book chapter

Il dibattito come rischio educativo

Maria Załęska
University of Warsaw, Poland - ORCID: 0000-0003-2973-0173


«It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it», says a quote from Joseph Joubert. Debate is one of the most valued text genres and is therefore included in curricular or extracurricular academic activities. What do we teach by teaching how to debate? What do students learn by learning how to debate? They can compete, collaborate and might even develop a new skill. Since concrete educational choices reflect a certain underlying educational philosophy, in what follows the model proposed by Biesta (2010,2016,2017) will be illustrated. The theoretical knowledge drawn from this framework will then be applied to the analysis of the Oxford Debate, in the version adopted by the regulated debate tournaments in Poland as well as to the discussion of a modification of the Oxford Debate itself, inspired by the concept of 'risk of education' (or rather, 'The Beautiful risk of educatio', as the title of one of Biesta’s books reads).
Read more

Keywords: Argumentation Theory, debate, education



Pages: 55-65

Published by: Firenze University Press

Publication year: 2021

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.06

Download PDF

© 2021 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0


Publication year: 2021

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.06

Download XML

© 2021 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0


  1. Biesta, G. J. J. 2010. Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.
  2. Biesta, G. J. J. 2016. The beautiful risk of education. London/New York: Routledge.
  3. Biesta, G. J. J. 2017. The rediscovery of teaching. London/New York: Routledge.
  4. Cattani, A. 2018. Palestra di botta e risposta. Per una formazione al dibattito. Padova:
  5. Cattani, A. 2019. Avere ragione. Piccolo manuale di retorica dialogica. Roma: Dino Audino.
  6. Cattani, A., e N. Varisco. 2019. Dibattito argomentato e regolamentato. Teoria e pratica di una Palestra di botta e risposta. Torino: Loescher.
  7. Cunliffe, A. L. 2004. “On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner.” Journal of Management Education 28 (4): 407-26.
  8. Field, J. 2000. Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Stroke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham.
  9. Joubert, J. 1838. Recueil des pensées de M. Joubert. Paris: Hachette Livre-BNF.
  10. Mouffe, C. 2016. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
  11. Załęska, M. 2003. “Non scholae, sed vitae discimus. Retoryka a sprawność pisania w języku obcym.” [Non scholae, sed vitae discimus. Rhetoric and writing competence in a foreign language] In Nauczanie retoryki w teorii i praktyce, a cura di J. Z. Lichański
  12. Załęska, M. 2014a. Retorica della linguistica. Scienza, struttura, scrittura, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  13. Załęska, M. 2014b. “Retoryka i glottodydaktyka: nauczanie języka włoskiego.” [Rhetoric and glottodidactics: teaching the Italian language] Języki Obce w Szkole 3: 35-9.
  14. Załęska, M. 2015. “Glottodidattica e retorica: dall’ars recte loquendi verso l’ars bene dicendi.” In Creatività nell’insegnamento dell’italiano come lingua straniera. Dalle parole ai testi, a cura di M. Załęska, 279-97. Warszawa: Katedra Italianistyki – U

Export citation

Selected format

Usage statistics policy

  • 8Chapter Downloads

Cita come:
Załęska, M.; 2021; Il dibattito come rischio educativo. Firenze, Firenze University Press.


Indici e aggregatori bibliometrici