Book chapter

Il peso delle emozioni nell’argomentazione sui social media

Gianmarco Tuccini
University of Florence, Italy

Goffredo Guidi
University of Florence, Italy


ABOUT THIS CHAPTER

Social media are nowadays fertile ground for debates that are often rich in arguments of persuasive value. In the present writing, we hypothesize that emotions play a significant role in determining the success of arguments on social media. In order to validate the hypothesis, we analyzed Change My View, an Internet forum on Reddit where the persuasiveness of the discussions among participants is explicit and regulated by specific norms. Our analysis revealed that arguments enjoying a higher degree of success were characterized by two particular emotions: anticipation and joy, which we interpret as belonging to engagement, a more general emotional dimension that includes them both. Such characteristics of successful arguments lead us to consider the persuasive experience on social media as analogous to a playful experience. Like in a game, in order to successfully take part in such a persuasive experience, certain requirements are needed: commitment and respect for the rules as well as joyful participation.
Read more

Keywords: Online Debate, Emotions, Argumentation Theory

Formats

PDF

Pages: 119-127

Published by: Firenze University Press

Publication year: 2021

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.11

Download PDF

© 2021 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0

XML

Publication year: 2021

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.11

Download XML

© 2021 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0

References

  1. Aristotele. 2011. Retorica. Milano: Mondadori.
  2. Brysbaert, M., A. B. Warriner, e V. Kuperman. 2014. “Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.” Behavior research methods 46(3): 904-11.
  3. Cambria, E., A. Livingstone, e A. Hussain. 2012. “The hourglass of emotions.” Cognitive behavioural systems: 144-57.
  4. Cambria, E., S. Poria, D. Hazarika, e K. Kwok. 2018. “SenticNet 5: Discovering conceptual primitives for sentiment analysis by means of context embeddings.” Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence: 1785-1802.
  5. Fogg, B. J. 2008. “Mass interpersonal persuasion: An early view of a new phenomenon.” International conference on persuasive technology: 23-34.
  6. Gilbert, M. A. 1995. “Coalescent argumentation.” Argumentation 9(5): 837-52.
  7. Giulio, P. 1968. Retorica e logica. Le due culture. Torino: Einaudi.
  8. Lanfredini, R., e A. Niccoli. 2020. “Emozioni e comunicazione affettiva.” In Comunicare ad arte, Ed. B. Baldi, 43-60. Bologna: Zanichelli.
  9. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca L., e C. Schick. 2001 (1958). Trattato dell’argomentazione: la nuova retorica. Torino: Einaudi.
  10. Sennett, R. 2002 (1974). The fall of the public man. London: Penguin, London.
  11. Stevenson, C. L. 1947. Ethics and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Tan, C., V. Niculae, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, e L. Lee. 2016. “Winning arguments: Interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions.” Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web: 613-24.
  13. Warriner, A. B., V. Kuperman, e M. Brysbaert. 2013. “Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas.” Behavior research methods 45(4): 1191-1207.

Export citation

Selected format

Usage statistics policy

  • 5Chapter Downloads

Cita come:
Tuccini, G.; Guidi, G.; 2021; Il peso delle emozioni nell’argomentazione sui social media. Firenze, Firenze University Press.


Distributori


Indici e aggregatori bibliometrici