Book chapter

Measuring logical competences and soft skills when enrolling in a university degree course

Bruno Bertaccini
University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-5816-2964

Riccardo Bruni
University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-2695-0058

Federico Crescenzi
University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-0701-4398

Beatrice Donati
University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-4707-8476


ABOUT THIS CHAPTER

Logical abilities are a ubiquitous ingredient in all those contexts that take into account soft skills, argumentative skills or critical thinking. However, the relationship between logical models and the enhancement of these abilities is rarely explicitly considered. Two aspects of the issue are particularly critical in our opinion, namely: (i) the lack of statistically relevant data concerning these competences; (ii) the absence of reliable indices that might be used to measure and detect the possession of abilities underlying the above-mentioned soft skills. This paper aims to address both aspects of this topic by presenting the results of a research we conducted in the period October – December 2020 on students enrolled in various degree courses at the University of Florence. To the best of our knowledge, to date this is the largest available database on the subject in the Italian University System. It has been obtained by a three-stage initiative. We started from an “entrance” examination for assessing the students' initial abilities. This test comprised ten questions, each of which was centered on a specific reasoning construct. The results we have collected show that there is a widespread lack of understanding of basic patterns that are common in the everyday way of arguing. Students then underwent a short training course, using formal logic techniques in order to strengthen their abilities, and afterwards took an “exit” examination, replicating the structure and the questions difficulty of the entrance one in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the course. Results show that the training was beneficial.
Read more

Keywords: studentes' logical abilities, IRT, test equating

Formats

PDF

Pages: 41-46

Published by: Firenze University Press

Publication year: 2021

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-304-8.09

Download PDF

© 2021 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0

XML

Publication year: 2021

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-304-8.09

Download XML

© 2021 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0

References

  1. Bartolucci, F., Bacci, S., Gnaldi, M. (2016). Statistical analysis of questionnaires: a unified approach based on R and Stata. Chapman & Hall, CRC Press, Boca Raton (FL).
  2. Battauz, M. (2015). EquateIRT: An R Package for IRT Test Equating. Journal of Statistical Software, 68 (7), pp 1–22.
  3. Chen, C.M., Lee, H.M, Chen, Y.H. (2005). Personalized e-learning system using item response theory. Computers & Education, 44 (3), pp. 237–255.
  4. DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (GB).
  5. Gonzales, J., Wiberg, M. (2017). Applying Test Equating Methods - Using R. Springer, Cham (CH).
  6. Haberman, S. J. (2005). Identifiability of Parameters in Item Response Models With Uncon- strained Ability Distributions. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ. Research Report.
  7. Kolen, M. J., Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (3rd ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
  8. Lee, Y., Palazzo, D. J., Warnakulaso oriya, R., Pritchard, D. E. (2008). Measuring student learning with item response theory. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1)
  9. Rizopoulos D. (2006). Ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17 (5), pp 1–25.

Export citation

Selected format

Usage statistics policy

  • 21Chapter Downloads

Cita come:
Bertaccini, B.; Bruni, R.; Crescenzi, F.; Donati, B.; 2021; Measuring logical competences and soft skills when enrolling in a university degree course. Firenze, Firenze University Press.


Distributori


Indici e aggregatori bibliometrici