Book chapter

Sostenibilità e riproduzione del capitale territoriale: il problema della scala di analisi

Benedetto Rocchi
University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-7545-3093

ABOUT THIS CHAPTER

Starting from a critique of the concept of "natural capital" which helps in defining the concepts of territorial and rural capital, the utility is affirmed of measuring the sustainability of individual and collective actions with respect to the contribution they offer to their production and reproduction. The analysis of case studies therefore poses the problem of over-exploitation of territorial capital in the absence of adequate investments for its reproduction. This requires a detailed evaluation of the eco-territorial services, focusing on the communities of actors who take care of them.
Read more

Keywords: natural capital, territorial capital, rural capital, sustainability, local community

Firenze University Press Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing

Formats

PDF

Pages: 97-103

Published by: Firenze University Press

Publication year: 2020

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-050-4.12

Download PDF

© 2020 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0

XML

Publication year: 2020

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-050-4.12

Download XML

© 2020 Author(s)
Content licence CC BY 4.0
Metadata licence CC0 1.0

References

  1. CCN - Comitato Capitale Naturale (2017), Primo Rapporto sullo Stato del Capitale Naturale in Italia, Roma.
  2. CCN - Comitato Capitale Naturale (2018), Secondo Rapporto sullo Stato del Capitale Naturale in Italia, Roma.
  3. Belletti G e Neri T, 2012. Impatto ambientale di modelli alternativi di produzione-distribuzione-consumo e possibili forme di etichettatura. Agriregionieuropa, 8(30): 44-47.
  4. Castle E.N. (1998), “A conceptual framework for the study of rural places”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, n. 80, pp. 621-631.
  5. Dasgupta P., Mahler K.G. (2001), “Wealth as a criterion of sustainable development”, World Economics, vol. 2, n. 3, pp. 19-44.
  6. Garrod B., Wornell R., Youell R. (2006), “Re-conceptualising rural resources as countryside capital: the case of rural tourism”, Journal of Rural Studies, n. 22, pp. 117-128.
  7. Hamilton K., Atkinsons G. (2006), Wealth, welfare and sustainability. Advances in measuring sustainable development, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
  8. Magnaghi A., Fanfani D. (2010 - a cura di), Patto città campagna. Un progetto di bioregione urbana per la Toscana centrale, Alinea, Firenze.
  9. Ostrom E. (1990), Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  10. Van Huylenbroeck G., Vandermeulen V., Mettepenningen E., Verspecht A. (2007), “Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments”, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, vol. 1, n. 3 <http://lrlr.landscapeonline.de/Articles/lrlr-2007-3/> (01/2020)
I servizi ecosistemici nella pianificazione bioregionale

This chapter is part of

I servizi ecosistemici nella pianificazione bioregionale

Edited by: Poli, Daniela

Export citation

Selected format

Usage statistics policy
  • 3Chapter Downloads

Cita come:
Rocchi, B.; 2020; Sostenibilità e riproduzione del capitale territoriale: il problema della scala di analisi. Firenze, Firenze University Press.

Distributori

Indici e aggregatori bibliometrici