Firenze University Press
Home
About
Login
Link utili
Help
Contacts
English version
Università degli studi di Firenze
Catalogue
New releases
Series
Journals
Scientific Boards
Open Access
Electronica
Best Practice
I. FUP in a nutshell
II. FUP Scientific Cloud for Books
III. Peer review policy
IV. Open Access, Copyright and Licensing policy
V. Submissions policy
VI. Distributions, Indexing & Abstracting policy
VII. Revenue sources and publication charge policy
VIII. Publication Ethics and Complaint policy
IX. Digital preservation and legal deposit policy
X. Advertising policy
XI. Privacy and Consent policy
Chi siamo
Storia
Missione e obiettivi
Pubblicare con FUP
Perché pubblicare con FUP
Promozione
Digitale e cartaceo
Repertori, aggregatori...
Deposito legale
Per gli autori
FAQ sul Diritto d'autore
Proposta di pubblicazione
Norme editoriali
Supporto legale per riviste
Regolamento
Organi direttivi
Criteri qualità scientifica
Customer Support
Help topics
Order policies
Payment methods
Shipping policies
Returns & refunds
Privacy & security
Services for Authors
Copyright FAQ
Legal support for Journals
(
0
)
Tu sei qui:
Home
Best Practice
III. Peer review policy
III. Peer review policy
Publishing proposals (
Submissions policy
) are submitted to the
FUP Editorial Board
via the Director of the publishing house, who gives an initial editorial, technical and economic evaluation. The Editorial Board is composed of academics, spanning from the domain of human and social sciences to that of the natural, technological and biomedical sciences. Their task is to decide through an external peer-review process on the publication proposal by accepting it, refusing it, or asking the author to revise it. If a revision of the work is requested, the referees verify whether the Author has made the requested changes. If there are inconsistencies with what has been requested, the work is submitted again to the Editorial Board for a final evaluation.
A new publishing proposal can be submitted by the author, or by a
Scientific board
already publishing a series in the FUP catalogue (https://www.fupress.com/comitatoscientifico).
The author’s proposal is evaluated by at least two reviewers through a single-blind peer-review process.
The publishing proposal submitted by a Scientific board must be accompanied by the
report of two referees
: at least one of the two must be external to the proposing Committee.
The FUP Editorial board, however, has the last word on the publication decision. Every publishing proposal must be deliberated by the FUP Editorial Board; exceptionally, some works may not be subject to external refereeing process due to their specific nature.
The FUP Editorial board’s members’ names, as well as the Editor-in-Chief’s and the FUP Series Scientific board’s members’, are published in the on-line catalogue and in every single book.
FUP Editorial board
Published by FUP
CC BY 4.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/fup_best_practice.3
» Firenze University Press Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing
x
Iscriviti alla Newsletter
Accetto i termini sulla privacy
Aree di interesse
Selezione l'area di interesse che preferisci
Scienze matematiche e informatiche
Scienze fisiche
Scienze chimiche
Scienze della terra
Scienze biologiche
Scienze mediche
Scienze agrarie e veterinarie
Ingegneria civile e Architettura
Ingegneria industriale e dell'informazione
Scienze dell'antichità, filologico-letterarie e storico-artistiche
Scienze storiche, filosofiche, pedagogiche e psicologiche
Scienze giuridiche
Scienze economiche e statistiche
Scienze politiche e sociali
x
Il tuo carrello
Titolo
Quantita
Prezzo